Vince Girdhari Chhabria at a glance
- Current role
- Judge
- Court
- U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
- Jurisdiction
- California · Federal
- Judicial service
- March 7, 2014–present
Judge · U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Loading public docket analytics…
Loading public docket analytics…
Born 1969 · San Francisco, CA
Judge Chhabria requires each PDF document to be text-searchable, may require digital courtesy copies on portable media, and requires proposed orders to be sent in Microsoft Word format.
Each PDF document must be text-searchable... The Court may at times order the parties to provide digital courtesy copies... on portable media... All proposed orders should be sent in Microsoft Word formatJudge Chhabria's Civil Standing Order ↗
The Northern District of California publishes guidance advising counsel to fully test their equipment and schedule a courtroom visit to test it before the proceeding.
The court highly recommends that counsel be familiar their equipment and fully test prior to using anything in the courtroom. ... schedule a visit in the courtroom to test everything before the proceeding.Courtroom Technology ↗
For e-evidence requiring specialized software, the Northern District of California publishes a process for at least two business days' advance notice through the Courtroom Deputy and approval by the judge and Court IT.
at least two (2) business days advance notice, counsel may request via the Courtroom Deputy that the specialized software be loaded by counsel prior to use of the system. If the judge and the court’s IT Department approve...Courtroom Technology ↗
In federal district-court civil proceedings, testimony is ordinarily taken in open court; remote contemporaneous testimony requires good cause in compelling circumstances and appropriate safeguards.
For good cause in compelling circumstances and with appropriate safeguards, the court may permit testimony in open court by contemporaneous transmission from a different location.Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 43(a), Testimony in Open Court ↗
Federal district courts may not permit courtroom photography or broadcasting during criminal judicial proceedings unless a statute or another federal rule provides an exception.
Except as otherwise provided by a statute or these rules, the court must not permit the taking of photographs in the courtroom during judicial proceedings or the broadcasting of judicial proceedings from the courtroom.Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 53, Courtroom Photographing and Broadcasting Prohibited ↗
Identity source · HTML · checked August 16, 2026
https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges/Identity source · HTML · checked August 2, 2026
https://www.courtlistener.com/person/604/vince-girdhari-chhabria/Judge research source · HTML · checked July 26, 2026
https://cand.uscourts.gov/attorneys/courtroom-technologyJudge research source · PDF · checked July 26, 2026
https://cand.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/standing-orders/VC-Civil-Standing-Order-2025-06-27.pdfJudge research source · HTML · checked July 26, 2026
https://www.uscourts.gov/forms-rules/current-rules-practice-procedure/federal-rules-civil-procedureJudge research source · HTML · checked July 26, 2026
https://www.uscourts.gov/court-records/access-court-proceedings/remote-public-access-proceedings/history-cameras-broadcasting-and-remote-public-access-courts