KYJKnow Your Judge v0.6.2by SwansLake
Judge directoryTodd T. Wong

Active Trial judge

Todd T. Wong

Texas County Court at Law No. 1

Texas · Travis

Identity verifiedOfficial profile locatedOfficial sources collectedPresentation intelligence
01

Overview

Identity and service

Official statewide and applicable court procedural guidance applies to this judge.

Judicial role
Judge, Travis County Court at Law No. 1
Service status
Active
Court level
Trial
Jurisdiction
State
02

Before you appear

Preparation checklist

  1. 01

    Read the judge-specific standing order first when one is listed.

  2. 02

    Check the docket and case orders for requirements that supersede broader guidance.

  3. 03

    Confirm current remote-access and courtroom technology arrangements before the proceeding.

Scope note

Statewide and courtwide guidance is labeled by scope and is not evidence of a personal preference. Division, judge-specific, or case-specific orders may control.

03

Presentation rules

What the public sources say

CourtwideExplicit
Hearing Or Trial

Leave required

Travis County courtrooms support PowerPoint, digitized exhibits, taped depositions, video evidence, document-camera material, and laptop presentations, but counsel must first obtain the judge's permission before routing a laptop presentation to the courtroom displays.

Page
3, 7, 14
Section
Summary; Dell PC; Attorney Tables
Last checked
July 28, 2026
Verification
Automated checks passed
Read supporting source excerpt
YOU MUST FIRST make sure the Judge is ok with you presenting. Then the Judge will have to unlock the video routing source button for you to use it.

The requirement is stated in current official court rules and is attached at court scope, not as a personal preference.

CourtwideExplicit
Hearing Or Trial

Leave required

Virtual or hybrid hearings, trials, and witness appearances must be arranged in advance and approved by the court.

Page
15
Section
Virtual Witness, Courtroom Cameras and Zoom
Last checked
July 28, 2026
Verification
Automated checks passed
Read supporting source excerpt
Any requests for hybrid or virtual options for hearings/trials/witnesses must be pre-arranged and approved by the Court.

The requirement is stated in current official court rules and is attached at court scope, not as a personal preference.

CourtwideExplicit
Pretrial

Restricted

Before any trial or hearing, counsel must affix exhibit labels to every exhibit they intend to introduce.

Page
7
Section
Rule 1.7: Exhibits
Last checked
July 28, 2026
Verification
Automated checks passed
Read supporting source excerpt
prior to the trial or hearing, ensure that all exhibits they intend to introduce have an exhibit label affixed thereto.

The requirement is stated in current official court rules and is attached at court scope, not as a personal preference.

CourtwideExplicit
Hearing Or Trial

Restricted

County Courts at Law Nos. 1 and 2 maintain a central civil docket, so filing or prior pretrial activity in one court does not guarantee that later proceedings will remain before that court.

Page
8
Section
Rule 2.2: Setting Cases
Last checked
July 28, 2026
Verification
Automated checks passed
Read supporting source excerpt
The fact that a case was filed in a court, or that pre-trial matters were heard by a court, does not mean all proceedings will be in that same court.

The requirement is stated in current official court rules and is attached at court scope, not as a personal preference.

CourtwideExplicit
Hearing Or Trial

Technology guidance published

The civil County Courts at Law provide an easel, document camera, overhead projector, video equipment, and other presentation equipment. Counsel may arrange to become familiar with the equipment before a hearing or trial.

Page
5
Section
15. Audio/Visual Equipment
Last checked
July 28, 2026
Verification
Automated checks passed
Read supporting source excerpt
The Court provides its own easel, Elmo, overhead projector, video equipment or other presentation equipment.

The requirement is stated in current official court rules and is attached at court scope, not as a personal preference.

StatewideExplicit
Civil Hearing Or Trial

Allowed with notice

In civil district and county court proceedings, the court may permit or require electronic participation after appropriate notice; compelled electronic participation for oral-testimony proceedings requires good cause or party agreement, and a jury trial requires party agreement.

Page
Official PDF
Section
Rule 21d(b)-(f); civil district and county courts only; current July 1, 2026 compilation
Effective
February 1, 2023
Last checked
July 26, 2026
Verification
Automated checks passed
Read supporting source excerpt
Upon appropriate notice by a party or the court, a court may allow or require a participant to appear at a court proceeding by videoconference, teleconference, or other available electronic means, except as otherwise provided in (2).

The requirement is stated in an official statewide source and is attached as applicable guidance, not as a personal preference.

StatewideExplicit
Civil Proceeding

Leave required

Civil district and county trial courts may permit courtroom recording or broadcasting only under Supreme Court guidelines, with the required party and witness consent, or for ceremonial proceedings.

Page
Official PDF
Section
Rule 18c; civil district and county courts only; current July 1, 2026 compilation
Last checked
July 26, 2026
Verification
Automated checks passed
Read supporting source excerpt
A trial court may permit broadcasting, televising, recording, or photographing of proceedings in the courtroom only in the following circumstances:

The requirement is stated in an official statewide source and is attached as applicable guidance, not as a personal preference.

04

Courtroom technology

Published equipment guidance

No technology specification indexed

Technology availability is separate from procedural permission and evidentiary admissibility.

05

Published opinion footprint

Decisions and citations

Opinion data is not yet indexed for this profile

This does not mean the judge has no published opinions or no caseload. KYJ will only show opinion counts after transparent, source-linked CourtListener matching is available.

06

Sources

Public documents behind this profile

07

Change history

How this profile entered KYJ

Current profile indexed

Identity imported from Travis County Court at Law No. 1. 7 presentation-related claims migrated with source provenance.