KYJKnow Your Judge v0.6.2by SwansLake
Judge directoryTerrence L. Holmes

Active Trial judge

Terrence L. Holmes

Texas County Court at Law No. 2

Texas · Jefferson

Identity verifiedOfficial profile locatedOfficial sources collectedPresentation intelligence
01

Overview

Identity and service

Official statewide and applicable court procedural guidance applies to this judge.

Judicial role
Statutory County Court Judge
Service status
Active
Court level
Trial
Jurisdiction
State
02

Background

Biography and career

Born
November 5, 1956 in Houma, LA
Gender
Male
Race
Black or African American
Political affiliation
Democratic (source unspecified)

Education

  • Prairie View A & M UniversitySoil Science, 1982
  • Southern University Law CenterLiberal Studies, 1980
  • Texas Southern Universitymagna cum laude, 1990

Professional career

  • Assistant County Attorney, Orange County, TX, 1990-1994
  • adj-prof, Lamar University, TX, 1993-1996
  • adj-prof, Texas Southern University, Houston, TX, 1993-1996
  • Practitioner, Private Practice, Beaumont & Orange, TX, 1994-1996
  • Certified Hearing Examiner, Texas Education Agency, TX, 1996-1998

Judicial service

  • Judge, City of Beaumont Municipal Court, Beaumont, TX, 2009-2017
  • Presiding Judge, Texas County Courts at Law - Jefferson County Court at Law, TX, 2016-2018
  • Presiding Judge, Texas County Courts at Law - Jefferson County Court at Law, TX, 2019-2022

Source: CourtListener / Free Law Project public biographical data. Demographic and political labels are incomplete, source-attributed, and are not used to infer judicial behavior. “Via appointer” describes CourtListener’s attribution method, not verified personal party membership.

03

Before you appear

Preparation checklist

  1. 01

    Read the judge-specific standing order first when one is listed.

  2. 02

    Check the docket and case orders for requirements that supersede broader guidance.

  3. 03

    Confirm current remote-access and courtroom technology arrangements before the proceeding.

Scope note

Statewide and courtwide guidance is labeled by scope and is not evidence of a personal preference. Division, judge-specific, or case-specific orders may control.

04

Presentation rules

What the public sources say

StatewideExplicit
Civil Hearing Or Trial

Allowed with notice

In civil district and county court proceedings, the court may permit or require electronic participation after appropriate notice; compelled electronic participation for oral-testimony proceedings requires good cause or party agreement, and a jury trial requires party agreement.

Page
Official PDF
Section
Rule 21d(b)-(f); civil district and county courts only; current July 1, 2026 compilation
Effective
February 1, 2023
Last checked
July 26, 2026
Verification
Automated checks passed
Read supporting source excerpt
Upon appropriate notice by a party or the court, a court may allow or require a participant to appear at a court proceeding by videoconference, teleconference, or other available electronic means, except as otherwise provided in (2).

The requirement is stated in an official statewide source and is attached as applicable guidance, not as a personal preference.

StatewideExplicit
Civil Proceeding

Leave required

Civil district and county trial courts may permit courtroom recording or broadcasting only under Supreme Court guidelines, with the required party and witness consent, or for ceremonial proceedings.

Page
Official PDF
Section
Rule 18c; civil district and county courts only; current July 1, 2026 compilation
Last checked
July 26, 2026
Verification
Automated checks passed
Read supporting source excerpt
A trial court may permit broadcasting, televising, recording, or photographing of proceedings in the courtroom only in the following circumstances:

The requirement is stated in an official statewide source and is attached as applicable guidance, not as a personal preference.

05

Courtroom technology

Published equipment guidance

No technology specification indexed

Technology availability is separate from procedural permission and evidentiary admissibility.

06

Published opinion footprint

Decisions and citations

Opinion data is not yet indexed for this profile

This does not mean the judge has no published opinions or no caseload. KYJ will only show opinion counts after transparent, source-linked CourtListener matching is available.

07

Sources

Public documents behind this profile

08

Change history

How this profile entered KYJ

Current profile indexed

Identity imported from Texas Office of Court Administration. 2 presentation-related claims migrated with source provenance.