Stephanie Marie Rose at a glance
- Current role
- Judge
- Court
- U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa
- Jurisdiction
- Iowa · Federal
- Judicial service
- September 17, 2012–present
Stephanie Marie Rose
Judge · U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa
Available research
Case AnalyticsPrecomputed 1Y, 2Y, 5Y, and 10Y public federal docket metricsAI abuse cases2 directly linked casesBiography and careerSource-attributed professional, judicial, and education recordCourtroom rules3 sourced items, labeled by scopeSourcesOfficial and public records supporting this profile
Loading public docket analytics…
Loading public docket analytics…
AI abuse cases
2 casesAI-related ruling · April 30, 2026
Burnside v. Verdick, et al.
- Court response
- Order to Show Cause
AI-related ruling · September 4, 2025
April Ann Nelson v. Navient Solutions, LLC, et al.
- Court response
- Warning
Biography
Professional career
- U.S. attorney for the Northern District of Iowa, 2009-2012
- deputy chief, Criminal Division, 2008-2009
- Assistant U.S. attorney, Northern District of Iowa, 1999-2009
- Assistant attorney general, State of Iowa, designated as special assistant U.S. attorney, Northern District of Iowa, 1997-1999
Judicial service
- Judge, District Court, S.D. Iowa, 2012-present
Education
- University of Iowa · B.A., 1994
Personal record
Born 1972 · Topeka, KS
Courtroom rules and guidance
Courtroom Technology
Courtwide presentation-related guidance applies to this judge.
Our courtrooms are open for demonstration and testing upon request. We highly encourage parties to come in prior to a trial/hearing to test and get familiar with the courtroom technology. This is especially true if parties will be presenting from their own laptop.Courtroom Technology | Southern District of Iowa | United States District Court ↗
Civil Remote Testimony
In federal district-court civil proceedings, testimony is ordinarily taken in open court; remote contemporaneous testimony requires good cause in compelling circumstances and appropriate safeguards.
For good cause in compelling circumstances and with appropriate safeguards, the court may permit testimony in open court by contemporaneous transmission from a different location.Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 43(a), Testimony in Open Court ↗
Criminal Recording And Broadcasting
Federal district courts may not permit courtroom photography or broadcasting during criminal judicial proceedings unless a statute or another federal rule provides an exception.
Except as otherwise provided by a statute or these rules, the court must not permit the taking of photographs in the courtroom during judicial proceedings or the broadcasting of judicial proceedings from the courtroom.Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 53, Courtroom Photographing and Broadcasting Prohibited ↗
Sources
Federal Judicial Center biography
Identity source · HTML · checked July 25, 2026
https://www.fjc.gov/node/1394041CourtListener judicial biographical directory
Identity source · HTML · checked August 2, 2026
https://www.courtlistener.com/person/2771/stephanie-marie-rose/Courtroom Technology | Southern District of Iowa | United States District Court
Judge research source · HTML · checked July 24, 2026
https://www.iasd.uscourts.gov/courtroom-technologyFederal Rule of Civil Procedure 43(a), Testimony in Open Court
Judge research source · HTML · checked July 26, 2026
https://www.uscourts.gov/forms-rules/current-rules-practice-procedure/federal-rules-civil-procedureFederal Rule of Criminal Procedure 53, Courtroom Photographing and Broadcasting Prohibited
Judge research source · HTML · checked July 26, 2026
https://www.uscourts.gov/court-records/access-court-proceedings/remote-public-access-proceedings/history-cameras-broadcasting-and-remote-public-access-courts