Sharion Aycock at a glance
- Current role
- Judge
- Court
- U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi
- Jurisdiction
- Mississippi · Federal
- Judicial service
- October 22, 2007–present
Sharion Aycock
Judge · U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi
Available research
Case AnalyticsPrecomputed 1Y, 2Y, 5Y, and 10Y public federal docket metricsAI abuse cases3 directly linked casesBiography and careerSource-attributed professional, judicial, and education recordCourtroom rules2 sourced items, labeled by scopeSourcesOfficial and public records supporting this profile
Loading public docket analytics…
Loading public docket analytics…
AI abuse cases
3 casesAI-related ruling · June 8, 2026
Withers v. City of Aberdeen
- Court response
- Revoked pro hac vice; DQ resident attorneys from the case; Monetary Fine; Bar Referrals
AI-related ruling · December 19, 2025
Disability Rights Mississippi v. Palmer Home for Children
- Court response
- Monetary sanction; CLE requirement; notification to bar and other courts; attorney withdrawal.
AI-related ruling · November 25, 2025
Brian Smith v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
- Court response
- Warning
Biography
Professional career
- Judge, Mississippi Circuit Court, First Judicial District, 2003-2007
- Private practice, Mississippi, 1980-2003
Judicial service
- Judge, District Court, N.D. Mississippi, 2007-present
Education
- Mississippi State University · B.A., 1977
- Mississippi College School of Law
Personal record
Born 1955 · Tupelo, MS
Courtroom rules and guidance
Civil Remote Testimony
In federal district-court civil proceedings, testimony is ordinarily taken in open court; remote contemporaneous testimony requires good cause in compelling circumstances and appropriate safeguards.
For good cause in compelling circumstances and with appropriate safeguards, the court may permit testimony in open court by contemporaneous transmission from a different location.Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 43(a), Testimony in Open Court ↗
Criminal Recording And Broadcasting
Federal district courts may not permit courtroom photography or broadcasting during criminal judicial proceedings unless a statute or another federal rule provides an exception.
Except as otherwise provided by a statute or these rules, the court must not permit the taking of photographs in the courtroom during judicial proceedings or the broadcasting of judicial proceedings from the courtroom.Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 53, Courtroom Photographing and Broadcasting Prohibited ↗
Sources
Federal Judicial Center biography
Identity source · HTML · checked July 25, 2026
https://www.fjc.gov/node/1392641CourtListener judicial biographical directory
Identity source · HTML · checked August 2, 2026
https://www.courtlistener.com/person/143/sharion-aycock/Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 43(a), Testimony in Open Court
Judge research source · HTML · checked July 26, 2026
https://www.uscourts.gov/forms-rules/current-rules-practice-procedure/federal-rules-civil-procedureFederal Rule of Criminal Procedure 53, Courtroom Photographing and Broadcasting Prohibited
Judge research source · HTML · checked July 26, 2026
https://www.uscourts.gov/court-records/access-court-proceedings/remote-public-access-proceedings/history-cameras-broadcasting-and-remote-public-access-courts