Sara Elizabeth Hill at a glance
- Current role
- Judge
- Court
- U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
- Jurisdiction
- Oklahoma · Federal
- Judicial service
- January 2, 2024–present
Sara Elizabeth Hill
Judge · U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
Available research
Loading public docket analytics…
Loading public docket analytics…
AI abuse cases
1 caseAI-related ruling · February 24, 2026
Chapter Kris Jackson v. BOK Financial Corporation et al. (3)
- Court response
- Struck filings; Monetary sanction
Biography
Professional career
- Professional Career: Cherokee Nation, Tahlequah, Oklahoma, 2004-2023; assistant attorney general, 2004-2014; deputy attorney general, 2014-2015; secretary of natural resources, 2015-2019; attorney general, 2019-2023
- Professional Career: Special assistant U.S. attorney, Northern District of Oklahoma, 2014-2015
- Professional Career: Private practice, Tahlequah, Oklahoma, 2023
Education
- Northeastern State University · B.A., 2000
- University of Tulsa College of Law · J.D., 2003
Courtroom rules and guidance
Courtroom Technology
Courtwide presentation-related guidance applies to this judge.
Public Wi-fi Guidelines . Courtroom Technology . The United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma has technology available for use by counsel in all courtrooms.Court Technology | Northern District of Oklahoma | United States District Court ↗
Courtroom Technology
Courtwide presentation-related guidance applies to this judge.
Touch Screen Monitors: The witness box and the VEPS cart have monitors with touch annotation capabilities. Images viewed on each monitor are identical to the images appearing on all other evidence presentation monitors throughout the courtroom. • VEPS Cart Location: The LCD touch monitor on the VEPS cart acts as a control screen and video…Court_Technology_Courtroom_Video.pdf ↗
Civil Remote Testimony
In federal district-court civil proceedings, testimony is ordinarily taken in open court; remote contemporaneous testimony requires good cause in compelling circumstances and appropriate safeguards.
For good cause in compelling circumstances and with appropriate safeguards, the court may permit testimony in open court by contemporaneous transmission from a different location.Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 43(a), Testimony in Open Court ↗
Criminal Recording And Broadcasting
Federal district courts may not permit courtroom photography or broadcasting during criminal judicial proceedings unless a statute or another federal rule provides an exception.
Except as otherwise provided by a statute or these rules, the court must not permit the taking of photographs in the courtroom during judicial proceedings or the broadcasting of judicial proceedings from the courtroom.Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 53, Courtroom Photographing and Broadcasting Prohibited ↗
Sources
Federal Judicial Center biography
Identity source · HTML · checked July 25, 2026
https://www.fjc.gov/node/13761416Court Technology | Northern District of Oklahoma | United States District Court
Judge research source · HTML · checked July 24, 2026
https://www.oknd.uscourts.gov/Court%20TechnologyCourt_Technology_Courtroom_Video.pdf
Judge research source · PDF · checked July 24, 2026
https://oknd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/oknd/CourtTechnology/Court_Technology_Courtroom_Video.pdfFederal Rule of Civil Procedure 43(a), Testimony in Open Court
Judge research source · HTML · checked July 26, 2026
https://www.uscourts.gov/forms-rules/current-rules-practice-procedure/federal-rules-civil-procedureFederal Rule of Criminal Procedure 53, Courtroom Photographing and Broadcasting Prohibited
Judge research source · HTML · checked July 26, 2026
https://www.uscourts.gov/court-records/access-court-proceedings/remote-public-access-proceedings/history-cameras-broadcasting-and-remote-public-access-courts