Roseann Ambrosia Ketchmark at a glance
- Current role
- Judge
- Court
- U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri
- Jurisdiction
- Missouri · Federal
- Judicial service
- September 14, 2015–present
Roseann Ambrosia Ketchmark
Judge · U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Available research
Case AnalyticsPrecomputed 1Y, 2Y, 5Y, and 10Y public federal docket metricsAI abuse cases3 directly linked casesBiography and careerSource-attributed professional, judicial, and education recordCourtroom rules2 sourced items, labeled by scopeSourcesOfficial and public records supporting this profile
Loading public docket analytics…
Loading public docket analytics…
AI abuse cases
3 casesAI-related ruling · June 22, 2026
Euphoric, LLC et al. v. Westport Community Improvement District, et al. (2)
- Court response
- Order to Show Cause
AI-related ruling · June 3, 2026
Euphoric, LLC et al. v. Westport Community Improvement District, et al.
- Court response
- Admonishment
AI-related ruling · February 10, 2026
United States v. Clint Travis Rodgers
- Court response
- Admonishment
Biography
Professional career
- executive assistant, 2010-present
- first assistant, 2009-2010
- executive assistant, 2006-2007
- first assistant, 2001-2006
- Assistant U.S. attorney, Western District of Missouri, 2001-2015
- First assistant prosecutor, Platte County, MO, 1995-2001
- Assistant prosecutor, Jackson County, MO, 1990-1995
- Registered nurse, Lindsay, Oklahoma, and Kansas City, MO, 1986-1990
Judicial service
- Judge, District Court, W.D. Missouri, 2015-present
Education
- University of Oklahoma-Norman Campus · B.S., 1986
- University of Kansas · J.D., 1990
- University of Oklahoma
Personal record
Born 1963 · Lindsay, OK
Courtroom rules and guidance
Civil Remote Testimony
In federal district-court civil proceedings, testimony is ordinarily taken in open court; remote contemporaneous testimony requires good cause in compelling circumstances and appropriate safeguards.
For good cause in compelling circumstances and with appropriate safeguards, the court may permit testimony in open court by contemporaneous transmission from a different location.Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 43(a), Testimony in Open Court ↗
Criminal Recording And Broadcasting
Federal district courts may not permit courtroom photography or broadcasting during criminal judicial proceedings unless a statute or another federal rule provides an exception.
Except as otherwise provided by a statute or these rules, the court must not permit the taking of photographs in the courtroom during judicial proceedings or the broadcasting of judicial proceedings from the courtroom.Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 53, Courtroom Photographing and Broadcasting Prohibited ↗
Sources
Federal Judicial Center biography
Identity source · HTML · checked July 25, 2026
https://www.fjc.gov/node/1394796CourtListener judicial biographical directory
Identity source · HTML · checked August 2, 2026
https://www.courtlistener.com/person/8592/roseann-ambrosia-ketchmark/Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 43(a), Testimony in Open Court
Judge research source · HTML · checked July 26, 2026
https://www.uscourts.gov/forms-rules/current-rules-practice-procedure/federal-rules-civil-procedureFederal Rule of Criminal Procedure 53, Courtroom Photographing and Broadcasting Prohibited
Judge research source · HTML · checked July 26, 2026
https://www.uscourts.gov/court-records/access-court-proceedings/remote-public-access-proceedings/history-cameras-broadcasting-and-remote-public-access-courts