KYJKnow Your Judge v0.6.2by SwansLake
Judge directoryRichard M. Weinberg

Active Trial judge

Richard M. Weinberg

Criminal Court of the City of New York

New York

Identity verifiedOfficial profile locatedOfficial sources collectedPresentation intelligence
01

Overview

Identity and service

Official statewide and applicable court procedural guidance applies to this judge.

Judicial role
Judicial Officer
Service status
Active
Court level
Trial
Jurisdiction
State
02

Background

Biography and career

Gender
Male
Race
White

Education

  • New York UniversityLLM, 1978
  • George Washington UniversityJD, 1974
  • The New SchoolMA, 1972
  • University of Wisconsin-MadisonBA, 1967

Professional career

  • Acting Justice, Supreme Court, Appointed by Chief Administrative Judge Jonathan Lippman, 2006 to Present
  • Current court assignment: Criminal Court of the City of New York
  • Law Clerk, United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, NY, 1975-1977
  • Practitioner, Arent, Fox, Kintner, Plotkin & Kahn, Associate, 1977-1979
  • Practitioner, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, 1979-1981
  • att-gen-ass, NY, 1981-1989
  • adj-prof, New York Law School, NY, 1982-1991
  • General Counsel and Counsel to Speaker Peter F. Vallone, New York City Council, NY, 1989-2001
  • adj-prof, Yeshiva University, NY, 1992-2001
  • adj-prof, CUNY Queens College, New York, NY, 1994-2000
  • Faculty, Practicing Law Institute, 2001-present
  • Faculty, New York State Judicial Institute, NY, 2005-present

Judicial service

  • Judge, Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York, NY, 2001-2007
  • Acting Justice, NY, 2006-present
  • Presiding Judge, Midtown Community Court, NY, 2006-2012
  • Judge, Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York, NY, 2008-2017
  • Presiding Judge, Criminal Court of the City of New York, NY, 2012-present

Source: CourtListener / Free Law Project public biographical data. Demographic and political labels are incomplete, source-attributed, and are not used to infer judicial behavior. “Via appointer” describes CourtListener’s attribution method, not verified personal party membership.

03

Before you appear

Preparation checklist

  1. 01

    Read the judge-specific standing order first when one is listed.

  2. 02

    Check the docket and case orders for requirements that supersede broader guidance.

  3. 03

    Confirm current remote-access and courtroom technology arrangements before the proceeding.

Scope note

Statewide and courtwide guidance is labeled by scope and is not evidence of a personal preference. Division, judge-specific, or case-specific orders may control.

04

Presentation rules

What the public sources say

StatewideExplicit
Court Proceeding

Leave required

New York statewide rules require permission before photographing, filming, videotaping, audiotaping, broadcasting, or telecasting in court facilities, including courtrooms.

Page
Official rule page
Section
Part 29.1(a); party litigation recording requests and appellate/court-specific permissions are separately addressed
Last checked
July 26, 2026
Verification
Automated checks passed
Read supporting source excerpt
Taking photographs, films or videotapes, or audiotaping, broadcasting or telecasting, in a courthouse including any courtroom, office or hallway thereof, at any time or on any occasion, whether or not the court is in session, is forbidden, unless permission of the Chief Administrator of the Courts or a designee of the Chief Administrator is first obtained

The requirement is stated in an official statewide source and is attached as applicable guidance, not as a personal preference.

StatewideExplicit
Hearing Or Trial

Allowed with notice

The official Guide to New York Evidence identifies court control over presentation of evidence as a statewide evidence topic; counsel should expect the assigned judge to control the mode and order of proof.

Page
Official evidence guide page
Section
Article 1, Court's Role table of contents; consult the current rule document and case-specific orders before relying on demonstratives
Last checked
July 26, 2026
Verification
Automated checks passed
Read supporting source excerpt
1.07. COURT CONTROL OVER PRESENTATION OF EVIDENCE

The requirement is stated in an official statewide source and is attached as applicable guidance, not as a personal preference.

05

Courtroom technology

Published equipment guidance

No technology specification indexed

Technology availability is separate from procedural permission and evidentiary admissibility.

06

Published opinion footprint

Decisions and citations

Opinion data is not yet indexed for this profile

This does not mean the judge has no published opinions or no caseload. KYJ will only show opinion counts after transparent, source-linked CourtListener matching is available.

07

Sources

Public documents behind this profile

08

Change history

How this profile entered KYJ

Current profile indexed

Identity imported from New York State Unified Court System. 2 presentation-related claims migrated with source provenance.