Paul Gregory Byron at a glance
- Current role
- Judge
- Court
- U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida
- Jurisdiction
- Florida · Federal
- Judicial service
- June 24, 2014–present
Paul Gregory Byron
Judge · U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Available research
Loading public docket analytics…
Loading public docket analytics…
Biography
Professional career
- Private practice, Orlando, FL, 2005-2014
- Trial attorney, Asset Forfeiture and Money Laundering Section, U.S. Department of Justice, 2004-2005
- Private practice, Orlando, FL, 2003-2004
- Senior trial attorney, Office of the Prosecutor, International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, The Hague, 2001-2003
- Assistant U.S. attorney, Middle District of Florida, 1991-2001
- Private practice, Orlando, FL, 1990-1991
- U.S. Army Reserve, 1990-1994
- U.S. Army captain, JAG Corps, 1986-1990
Judicial service
- Judge, District Court, M.D. Florida, 2014-present
Education
- Miami Dade College · A.A., 1981
- University of Michigan
- Paul M. Hebert Law Center
Personal record
Born 1959 · Queens, NY
Courtroom rules and guidance
Courtroom Technology
Courtwide presentation-related guidance applies to this judge.
Assisted-Listening Headsets Headsets that enhance volume . Audio/Visual Players VHS and DVD players . Document Cameras (ELMO) Devices that display on a large screen a hardcopy document placed on the document camera .Courtroom Technology | Middle District of Florida | United States District Court ↗
Civil Remote Testimony
In federal district-court civil proceedings, testimony is ordinarily taken in open court; remote contemporaneous testimony requires good cause in compelling circumstances and appropriate safeguards.
For good cause in compelling circumstances and with appropriate safeguards, the court may permit testimony in open court by contemporaneous transmission from a different location.Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 43(a), Testimony in Open Court ↗
Criminal Recording And Broadcasting
Federal district courts may not permit courtroom photography or broadcasting during criminal judicial proceedings unless a statute or another federal rule provides an exception.
Except as otherwise provided by a statute or these rules, the court must not permit the taking of photographs in the courtroom during judicial proceedings or the broadcasting of judicial proceedings from the courtroom.Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 53, Courtroom Photographing and Broadcasting Prohibited ↗
Sources
Federal Judicial Center biography
Identity source · HTML · checked July 25, 2026
https://www.fjc.gov/node/1394581CourtListener judicial biographical directory
Identity source · HTML · checked August 2, 2026
https://www.courtlistener.com/person/495/paul-gregory-byron/Courtroom Technology | Middle District of Florida | United States District Court
Judge research source · HTML · checked July 24, 2026
https://www.flmd.uscourts.gov/courtroom-technologyFederal Rule of Civil Procedure 43(a), Testimony in Open Court
Judge research source · HTML · checked July 26, 2026
https://www.uscourts.gov/forms-rules/current-rules-practice-procedure/federal-rules-civil-procedureFederal Rule of Criminal Procedure 53, Courtroom Photographing and Broadcasting Prohibited
Judge research source · HTML · checked July 26, 2026
https://www.uscourts.gov/court-records/access-court-proceedings/remote-public-access-proceedings/history-cameras-broadcasting-and-remote-public-access-courts