KYJKnow Your Judge v0.6.2by SwansLake
Judge directoryMenachem M. Mirocznik

Active Trial judge

Menachem M. Mirocznik

Kings County Supreme Court, Civil Term

New York · Kings

Identity verifiedOfficial profile locatedOfficial sources collectedPresentation intelligence
01

Overview

Identity and service

Official judge-specific and circuitwide procedural guidance has been located for this profile.

Judicial role
Acting Supreme Court Justice, Kings County Civil Term, IAS Part 26 and Foreclosure Resolution Part 5
Service status
Active
Court level
Trial
Jurisdiction
State
02

Before you appear

Preparation checklist

  1. 01

    Read the judge-specific standing order first when one is listed.

  2. 02

    Check the docket and case orders for requirements that supersede broader guidance.

  3. 03

    Confirm current remote-access and courtroom technology arrangements before the proceeding.

Scope note

Judge-specific guidance is shown first. Broader applicable courtroom, courtwide, districtwide, and statewide guidance remains separately labeled below it.

03

Presentation rules

What the public sources say

Judge-specificExplicit
Pretrial

Justice Mirocznik requires counsel to premark trial exhibits in intended order and provide an exhibit list before trial.

Page
web page
Section
Trials
Last checked
July 28, 2026
Verification
Automated checks passed
Read supporting source excerpt
Counsel shall pre-mark all exhibits in the order in which they intend to introduce them at trial. A list of the exhibits shall be provided to the Court prior to trial.

The requirement is stated in an official standing order naming this judge.

Judge-specificExplicit
Trial

Justice Mirocznik requires witness and expert lists, intended deposition copies, and typed proposed jury charges and verdict sheets for trial.

Page
web page
Section
Trials
Last checked
July 28, 2026
Verification
Automated checks passed
Read supporting source excerpt
Prior to trial, counsel shall provide the Court proposed jury charges and proposed verdict sheets in typed form

The requirement is stated in an official standing order naming this judge.

CourtwideExplicit
Motion And Filing

Filed motions, orders, and other papers in Kings County Civil Term must use protruding exhibit tabs, subject to the stated exceptions.

Page
web page
Section
Papers
Last checked
July 28, 2026
Verification
Automated checks passed
Read supporting source excerpt
Motions, orders, and other filed papers shall be indexed with protruding tabs.

The requirement is stated in current official court rules and is attached at court scope, not as a personal preference.

CourtwideExplicit
Motion

Kings County Civil Term motions require appearances and oral argument unless controlling part rules provide otherwise.

Page
web page
Section
Motions in IAS Parts / Motion Calendar Calls
Last checked
July 28, 2026
Verification
Automated checks passed
Read supporting source excerpt
All motions require appearances and oral argument.

The requirement is stated in current official court rules and is attached at court scope, not as a personal preference.

CourtwideExplicit
Discovery Motion

Video exhibits submitted in the centralized Kings County discovery parts must be delivered on a USB drive with a notice of Hard Copy Exhibit Filing before the return date.

Page
web page
Section
Motions
Last checked
July 28, 2026
Verification
Automated checks passed
Read supporting source excerpt
Any video exhibits submitted to the court must be on a USB drive accompanied by the notice of Hard Copy Exhibit Filing prior to the return date.

The requirement is stated in current official court rules and is attached at court scope, not as a personal preference.

CourtwideExplicit
Deposition

Leave required

A video-conference deposition in a Kings County Civil Term case requires an order from the presiding judge.

Page
web page
Section
For Attorneys, question 3
Last checked
July 28, 2026
Verification
Automated checks passed
Read supporting source excerpt
To conduct a video conference for a deposition, an order from the judge presiding over your case is required.

The requirement is stated in current official court rules and is attached at court scope, not as a personal preference.

CourtwideExplicit
Trial

Leave required

Video-conference trial testimony requires advance approval from the trial judge.

Page
web page
Section
For Attorneys, question 3
Last checked
July 28, 2026
Verification
Automated checks passed
Read supporting source excerpt
To conduct a video conference for a trial testimony, approval must first be obtained from the trial judge.

The requirement is stated in current official court rules and is attached at court scope, not as a personal preference.

CourtwideExplicit
Summary Jury Trial

Allowed

Kings County Summary Jury Trials permit innovative jury presentations, including medical records, reports, and PowerPoint.

Page
web page
Section
Information Sheet, Essential Features
Last checked
July 28, 2026
Verification
Automated checks passed
Read supporting source excerpt
Innovative method of case presentation to the jury, including direct submission to jury of medical records, reports, power point presentations, etc.

The requirement is stated in current official court rules and is attached at court scope, not as a personal preference.

CourtwideExplicit
Summary Jury Trial

Summary Jury Trial exhibits and other physical evidence must be premarked and exchanged before trial or may be excluded.

Page
web page
Section
Information Sheet, General Rules
Last checked
July 28, 2026
Verification
Automated checks passed
Read supporting source excerpt
All evidence, trial notebook and exhibits must be exchanged in advance of trial or be excluded

The requirement is stated in current official court rules and is attached at court scope, not as a personal preference.

CourtwideExplicit
Summary Jury Trial

Allowed

Live or prerecorded video testimony is permitted in a Kings County Summary Jury Trial.

Page
web page
Section
Information Sheet, General Rules
Last checked
July 28, 2026
Verification
Automated checks passed
Read supporting source excerpt
Video live/pre-recorded testimony permitted

The requirement is stated in current official court rules and is attached at court scope, not as a personal preference.

StatewideExplicit
Court Proceeding

Leave required

New York statewide rules require permission before photographing, filming, videotaping, audiotaping, broadcasting, or telecasting in court facilities, including courtrooms.

Page
Official rule page
Section
Part 29.1(a); party litigation recording requests and appellate/court-specific permissions are separately addressed
Last checked
July 26, 2026
Verification
Automated checks passed
Read supporting source excerpt
Taking photographs, films or videotapes, or audiotaping, broadcasting or telecasting, in a courthouse including any courtroom, office or hallway thereof, at any time or on any occasion, whether or not the court is in session, is forbidden, unless permission of the Chief Administrator of the Courts or a designee of the Chief Administrator is first obtained

The requirement is stated in an official statewide source and is attached as applicable guidance, not as a personal preference.

StatewideExplicit
Hearing Or Trial

Allowed with notice

The official Guide to New York Evidence identifies court control over presentation of evidence as a statewide evidence topic; counsel should expect the assigned judge to control the mode and order of proof.

Page
Official evidence guide page
Section
Article 1, Court's Role table of contents; consult the current rule document and case-specific orders before relying on demonstratives
Last checked
July 26, 2026
Verification
Automated checks passed
Read supporting source excerpt
1.07. COURT CONTROL OVER PRESENTATION OF EVIDENCE

The requirement is stated in an official statewide source and is attached as applicable guidance, not as a personal preference.

04

Courtroom technology

Published equipment guidance

No technology specification indexed

Technology availability is separate from procedural permission and evidentiary admissibility.

05

Published opinion footprint

Decisions and citations

Opinion data is not yet indexed for this profile

This does not mean the judge has no published opinions or no caseload. KYJ will only show opinion counts after transparent, source-linked CourtListener matching is available.

06

Sources

Public documents behind this profile

07

Change history

How this profile entered KYJ

Current profile indexed

Identity imported from New York State Unified Court System. 12 presentation-related claims migrated with source provenance.