KYJKnow Your Judge v0.6.2by SwansLake
Judge directoryMartha Craig Daughtrey

Senior Circuit judge

Martha Craig Daughtrey

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Multi-state

Identity verifiedOfficial profile locatedOfficial sources collectedPresentation intelligence
01

Overview

Identity and service

Official statewide and applicable court procedural guidance applies to this judge.

Judicial role
Judge
Service status
Senior
Court level
Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
02

Background

Biography and career

Born
July 21, 1942 in Covington, KY
Gender
Female
Race
White
Political affiliation
Democratic (via appointer)

Education

  • Vanderbilt UniversityB.A., 1964
  • Vanderbilt UniversityJ.D., 1968
  • Vanderbilt UniversityBA
  • Vanderbilt UniversityJD

Professional career

  • Private practice, Nashville, TN, 1968-present
  • Assistant U.S. attorney, Middle District of Tennessee, 1968-1969
  • Assistant district attorney, Tenth Judicial Circuit, TN, 1969-1972
  • Faculty, Vanderbilt University Law School, 1972-1982
  • assistant professor of law, 1972-1975
  • lecturer in law, 1975-1982
  • Associate judge, Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals, Middle Division, 1975-1990
  • Faculty, Vanderbilt University Law School, 1988-1990
  • adjunct professor of law, 1988-1990
  • Practitioner, 1989-1989
  • prof, 1989-1989
  • Associate justice, Tennessee Supreme Court, 1990-1993

Judicial service

  • Judge, 1989-1989
  • Judge, Tennessee Supreme Court, 1990-1993
  • Judge, Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 1993-2009
  • Judge, 1994-1994

Source: CourtListener / Free Law Project public biographical data. Demographic and political labels are incomplete, source-attributed, and are not used to infer judicial behavior. “Via appointer” describes CourtListener’s attribution method, not verified personal party membership.

03

Before you appear

Preparation checklist

  1. 01

    Read the judge-specific standing order first when one is listed.

  2. 02

    Check the docket and case orders for requirements that supersede broader guidance.

  3. 03

    Confirm current remote-access and courtroom technology arrangements before the proceeding.

Scope note

Statewide and courtwide guidance is labeled by scope and is not evidence of a personal preference. Division, judge-specific, or case-specific orders may control.

04

Presentation rules

What the public sources say

CourtwideExplicit
Oral Argument

Allowed with notice

In federal courts of appeals, oral argument is allowed unless a three-judge panel unanimously finds one of Rule 34's specified grounds for dispensing with it; the clerk provides the date, time, place, and time allocation.

Page
Current official rules page and linked rules compilation
Section
Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 34(a)-(c); courts of appeals only
Last checked
July 26, 2026
Verification
Automated checks passed
Read supporting source excerpt
Oral argument must be allowed in every case unless a panel of three judges who have examined the briefs and record unanimously agrees that oral argument is unnecessary

The requirement is stated in current official court rules and is attached at court scope, not as a personal preference.

05

Courtroom technology

Published equipment guidance

No technology specification indexed

Technology availability is separate from procedural permission and evidentiary admissibility.

06

Published opinion footprint

Decisions and citations

Opinion data is not yet indexed for this profile

This does not mean the judge has no published opinions or no caseload. KYJ will only show opinion counts after transparent, source-linked CourtListener matching is available.

07

Sources

Public documents behind this profile

08

Change history

How this profile entered KYJ

Current profile indexed

Identity imported from Federal Judicial Center Biographical Directory. 1 presentation-related claim migrated with source provenance.