Mark Timothy Pittman at a glance
- Current role
- Judge
- Court
- U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas
- Jurisdiction
- Texas · Federal
- Judicial service
- August 5, 2019–present
Mark Timothy Pittman
Judge · U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Available research
Loading public docket analytics…
Loading public docket analytics…
Biography
Professional career
- Adjunct professor, Texas A&M University School of Law, 2019-present
- Justice, Second Court of Appeals of Texas, 2017-2019
- Judge, Tarrant County [Texas] Three Hundred and Fifty-Second District Court, 2015-2017
- Special assistant U.S. attorney, Economic Crimes Unit, Criminal Division, Northern District of Texas, 2014-2015
- Enforcement attorney, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Fort Worth, TX, 2011-2015
- Senior attorney, Division of Risk Management Supervision, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Dallas, TX, 2009-2011
- Assistant U.S. attorney, Northern District of Texas, 2007-2009
- Trial attorney, National Courts Section, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice, 2004-2007
- Private practice, Forth Worth, TX, 2001-2004
- Law clerk, Hon. Eldon B. Mahon, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, 2000-2001
- Private practice, Forth Worth, TX, 1999-2000
Judicial service
- Judge, District Court, N.D. Texas, 2019-present
Education
- University of Texas School of Law
- Texas A&M University
Personal record
Born 1975 · Big Spring, TX
Courtroom rules and guidance
Civil Remote Testimony
In federal district-court civil proceedings, testimony is ordinarily taken in open court; remote contemporaneous testimony requires good cause in compelling circumstances and appropriate safeguards.
For good cause in compelling circumstances and with appropriate safeguards, the court may permit testimony in open court by contemporaneous transmission from a different location.Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 43(a), Testimony in Open Court ↗
Criminal Recording And Broadcasting
Federal district courts may not permit courtroom photography or broadcasting during criminal judicial proceedings unless a statute or another federal rule provides an exception.
Except as otherwise provided by a statute or these rules, the court must not permit the taking of photographs in the courtroom during judicial proceedings or the broadcasting of judicial proceedings from the courtroom.Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 53, Courtroom Photographing and Broadcasting Prohibited ↗
Sources
Federal Judicial Center biography
Identity source · HTML · checked July 25, 2026
https://www.fjc.gov/node/6840196CourtListener judicial biographical directory
Identity source · HTML · checked August 2, 2026
https://www.courtlistener.com/person/14412/mark-timothy-pittman/Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 43(a), Testimony in Open Court
Judge research source · HTML · checked July 26, 2026
https://www.uscourts.gov/forms-rules/current-rules-practice-procedure/federal-rules-civil-procedureFederal Rule of Criminal Procedure 53, Courtroom Photographing and Broadcasting Prohibited
Judge research source · HTML · checked July 26, 2026
https://www.uscourts.gov/court-records/access-court-proceedings/remote-public-access-proceedings/history-cameras-broadcasting-and-remote-public-access-courts