Jeremy Daniel Kernodle at a glance
- Current role
- Judge
- Court
- U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
- Jurisdiction
- Texas · Federal
- Judicial service
- November 2, 2018–present
Jeremy Daniel Kernodle
Judge · U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Available research
Loading public docket analytics…
Loading public docket analytics…
AI abuse cases
1 caseAI-related ruling · March 2, 2026
Fabian Antonio Thomas v. Officer Skylar Sillivent, et al.
Biography
Professional career
- Private practice, Dallas, TX, 2006-2018
- Attorney-advisor, Office of Legal Counsel, U.S. Department of Justice, 2005-2006
- Private practice, Washington, D.C., 2002-2005
Judicial service
- Law Clerk, Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2001-2002
- Judge, District Court, E.D. Texas, 2018-present
- United States federal judge
Education
- Harding University · B.A., 1998
- Vanderbilt University · J.D., 2001
Personal record
Born 1976 · Memphis, TN
Courtroom rules and guidance
Presentation Procedure
Judge-specific source
It is the obligation of the party offering such a witness to arrange for an interpreter to be present at trial. Exhibit List : Each party shall file a list of exhibits (including demonstrative exhibits) to be offered at trial using the template available on Judge Kernodle’s website . The list of exhibits shall describe…Patent%20Scheduling%20Order.docx ↗
Presentation Procedure
Judge-specific source
It is the obligation of the party offering such a witness to arrange for an interpreter to be present at trial. Exhibit List: Each party shall file a list of exhibits (including demonstrative exhibits) to be offered at trial using the template available on Judge Kernodle’s website . The list of exhibits shall describe with…Standard%20Scheduling%20Order.docx ↗
Civil Remote Testimony
In federal district-court civil proceedings, testimony is ordinarily taken in open court; remote contemporaneous testimony requires good cause in compelling circumstances and appropriate safeguards.
For good cause in compelling circumstances and with appropriate safeguards, the court may permit testimony in open court by contemporaneous transmission from a different location.Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 43(a), Testimony in Open Court ↗
Criminal Recording And Broadcasting
Federal district courts may not permit courtroom photography or broadcasting during criminal judicial proceedings unless a statute or another federal rule provides an exception.
Except as otherwise provided by a statute or these rules, the court must not permit the taking of photographs in the courtroom during judicial proceedings or the broadcasting of judicial proceedings from the courtroom.Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 53, Courtroom Photographing and Broadcasting Prohibited ↗
Sources
Federal Judicial Center biography
Identity source · HTML · checked July 25, 2026
https://www.fjc.gov/node/5374586CourtListener judicial biographical directory
Identity source · HTML · checked August 2, 2026
https://www.courtlistener.com/person/8591/jeremy-daniel-kernodle/Patent%20Scheduling%20Order.docx
Judge research source · DOCX · checked July 24, 2026
https://www.txed.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/judgeFiles/Patent%20Scheduling%20Order.docxStandard%20Scheduling%20Order.docx
Judge research source · DOCX · checked July 24, 2026
https://www.txed.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/judgeFiles/Standard%20Scheduling%20Order.docxFederal Rule of Civil Procedure 43(a), Testimony in Open Court
Judge research source · HTML · checked July 26, 2026
https://www.uscourts.gov/forms-rules/current-rules-practice-procedure/federal-rules-civil-procedureFederal Rule of Criminal Procedure 53, Courtroom Photographing and Broadcasting Prohibited
Judge research source · HTML · checked July 26, 2026
https://www.uscourts.gov/court-records/access-court-proceedings/remote-public-access-proceedings/history-cameras-broadcasting-and-remote-public-access-courts