Jasmine Hyejung Yoon at a glance
- Current role
- Judge
- Court
- U.S. District Court for the Western District of Virginia
- Jurisdiction
- Virginia · Federal
- Judicial service
- July 8, 2024–present
Jasmine Hyejung Yoon
Judge · U.S. District Court for the Western District of Virginia
Available research
Case AnalyticsPrecomputed 1Y, 2Y, 5Y, and 10Y public federal docket metricsAI abuse cases2 directly linked casesBiography and careerSource-attributed professional, judicial, and education recordCourtroom rules2 sourced items, labeled by scopeSourcesOfficial and public records supporting this profile
Loading public docket analytics…
Loading public docket analytics…
AI abuse cases
2 casesAI-related ruling · March 12, 2026
Suiter v. GM - General Motors, LLC
- Court response
- Warning
AI-related ruling · December 9, 2025
Scott M. Boger v. City of Harrisonburg, Virginia, et al.
- Court response
- Warning
Biography
Professional career
- Professional Career: Office of the University Counsel, University of Virginia, 2019-2022; associate university counsel, 2019-2021; interim university counsel, 2021-2022
- Professional Career: Assistant attorney general, Commonwealth of Virginia, 2019-2022
- Professional Career: Law clerk, Hon. James C. Cacheris, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, 2009-2010
- Professional Career: Assistant U.S. attorney, Eastern District of Virginia, 2010-2016
- Professional Career: Private practice, Washington, D.C., 2006-2009
- Professional Career: Vice president, corporate integrity, ethics, and investigations, Capital One Financial Corporation, Richmond, Virginia, 2022-2024
Education
- University of Virginia School of Law · J.D., 2006
- University of Virginia · B.A., 2003
Courtroom rules and guidance
Civil Remote Testimony
In federal district-court civil proceedings, testimony is ordinarily taken in open court; remote contemporaneous testimony requires good cause in compelling circumstances and appropriate safeguards.
For good cause in compelling circumstances and with appropriate safeguards, the court may permit testimony in open court by contemporaneous transmission from a different location.Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 43(a), Testimony in Open Court ↗
Criminal Recording And Broadcasting
Federal district courts may not permit courtroom photography or broadcasting during criminal judicial proceedings unless a statute or another federal rule provides an exception.
Except as otherwise provided by a statute or these rules, the court must not permit the taking of photographs in the courtroom during judicial proceedings or the broadcasting of judicial proceedings from the courtroom.Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 53, Courtroom Photographing and Broadcasting Prohibited ↗
Sources
Federal Judicial Center biography
Identity source · HTML · checked July 25, 2026
https://www.fjc.gov/node/13761546Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 43(a), Testimony in Open Court
Judge research source · HTML · checked July 26, 2026
https://www.uscourts.gov/forms-rules/current-rules-practice-procedure/federal-rules-civil-procedureFederal Rule of Criminal Procedure 53, Courtroom Photographing and Broadcasting Prohibited
Judge research source · HTML · checked July 26, 2026
https://www.uscourts.gov/court-records/access-court-proceedings/remote-public-access-proceedings/history-cameras-broadcasting-and-remote-public-access-courts