Gloria Maria Navarro at a glance
- Current role
- Judge
- Court
- U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada
- Jurisdiction
- Nevada · Federal
- Judicial service
- May 6, 2010–present
Gloria Maria Navarro
Judge · U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada
Available research
Case AnalyticsPrecomputed 1Y, 2Y, 5Y, and 10Y public federal docket metricsAI abuse cases2 directly linked casesBiography and careerSource-attributed professional, judicial, and education recordCourtroom rules3 sourced items, labeled by scopeSourcesOfficial and public records supporting this profile
Loading public docket analytics…
Loading public docket analytics…
AI abuse cases
2 casesAI-related ruling · January 7, 2026
Thu Thuy Nguyen v. PennyMac Loan Services
- Court response
- Warning; Possible Monetary Sanction
AI-related ruling · December 30, 2025
M.T. Real Estate Investment Inc. v. Servis One, Inc., et al.
- Court response
- Briefs Struck; Adverse Costs Order; Bar Referral
Biography
Professional career
- Chief deputy district attorney, Civil Division, Clark County, NV, 2005-2010
- Deputy special public defender, Clark County, NV, 2001-2004
- Private practice, Las Vegas, NV, 1994-2001
- Research and writing specialist, Office of the Federal Public Defender, District of Nevada, 1993-1994
- Private practice, Las Vegas, NV, 1993-present
Judicial service
- Judge, District Court, D. Nevada, 2010-present
Education
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas
- Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law
Personal record
Born 1967 · Las Vegas, NV
Courtroom rules and guidance
Courtroom Technology
Judge-specific source
Attorneys must provide their trial exhibits in electronic format on a USB drive, DVD, or CD to the Courtroom Administrator by _________________. All electronic evidence should be provided using the following formats: • Documents and Photographs: .pdf, .jpg, .bmp, .tif, .gif • Video and Audio Recordings: .avi, .wmv, .mpg, .mp3, .mp4, .wma, .wav Regarding the…Order-Regarding-Trial-GMN.pdf ↗
Civil Remote Testimony
In federal district-court civil proceedings, testimony is ordinarily taken in open court; remote contemporaneous testimony requires good cause in compelling circumstances and appropriate safeguards.
For good cause in compelling circumstances and with appropriate safeguards, the court may permit testimony in open court by contemporaneous transmission from a different location.Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 43(a), Testimony in Open Court ↗
Criminal Recording And Broadcasting
Federal district courts may not permit courtroom photography or broadcasting during criminal judicial proceedings unless a statute or another federal rule provides an exception.
Except as otherwise provided by a statute or these rules, the court must not permit the taking of photographs in the courtroom during judicial proceedings or the broadcasting of judicial proceedings from the courtroom.Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 53, Courtroom Photographing and Broadcasting Prohibited ↗
Sources
Federal Judicial Center biography
Identity source · HTML · checked July 25, 2026
https://www.fjc.gov/node/1393111CourtListener judicial biographical directory
Identity source · HTML · checked August 2, 2026
https://www.courtlistener.com/person/2375/gloria-maria-navarro/Order-Regarding-Trial-GMN.pdf
Judge research source · PDF · checked July 24, 2026
https://www.nvd.uscourts.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/Order-Regarding-Trial-GMN.pdfFederal Rule of Civil Procedure 43(a), Testimony in Open Court
Judge research source · HTML · checked July 26, 2026
https://www.uscourts.gov/forms-rules/current-rules-practice-procedure/federal-rules-civil-procedureFederal Rule of Criminal Procedure 53, Courtroom Photographing and Broadcasting Prohibited
Judge research source · HTML · checked July 26, 2026
https://www.uscourts.gov/court-records/access-court-proceedings/remote-public-access-proceedings/history-cameras-broadcasting-and-remote-public-access-courts