KYJKnow Your Judge v0.6.2by SwansLake
Judge directoryFrancis Ricigliano

Active Trial judge

Francis Ricigliano

Nassau County Supreme Court, Civil Term

New York · Nassau

Identity verifiedOfficial profile locatedOfficial sources collectedPresentation intelligence
01

Overview

Identity and service

Official judge-specific and circuitwide procedural guidance has been located for this profile.

Judicial role
Supervising Judge, Supreme Court, IAS Part 20
Service status
Active
Court level
Trial
Jurisdiction
State
02

Background

Biography and career

Gender
Male

Education

  • Manhattan CollegeBA, 1985
  • Saint Johns UniversityJD, 1988

Professional career

  • Practitioner, Santangelo, Benvenuso, Slattery, NY, ?-present

Judicial service

  • Judge, Nassau County District Court, NY, 1999-1999
  • Judge, Nassau County District Court, NY, 2000-2000
  • Judge, Nassau County District Court, NY, 2003-2005
  • Judge, Nassau County District Court, NY, 2009-2014
  • Acting Justice, New York Supreme Court, Nassau County, 2015-present
  • Judge, New York County Court, Nassau County, NY, 2015-2025

Source: CourtListener / Free Law Project public biographical data. Demographic and political labels are incomplete, source-attributed, and are not used to infer judicial behavior. “Via appointer” describes CourtListener’s attribution method, not verified personal party membership.

03

Before you appear

Preparation checklist

  1. 01

    Read the judge-specific standing order first when one is listed.

  2. 02

    Check the docket and case orders for requirements that supersede broader guidance.

  3. 03

    Confirm current remote-access and courtroom technology arrangements before the proceeding.

Scope note

Judge-specific guidance is shown first. Broader applicable courtroom, courtwide, districtwide, and statewide guidance remains separately labeled below it.

04

Presentation rules

What the public sources say

Judge-specificExplicit
Trial

Allowed with notice

Justice Ricigliano requires advance notice to the court and opposing counsel before a visual aid or prospective evidentiary exhibit is used in an opening or summation.

Page
7, 9
Section
Trials, Openings and Summations
Effective
January 9, 2026
Last checked
July 28, 2026
Verification
Automated checks passed
Read supporting source excerpt
If during either lawyer's opening a visual aid or prospective evidentiary exhibit is to be used, opposing counsel and the Court must be notified of that prior to the opening.

The requirement is stated in an official standing order naming this judge.

StatewideExplicit
Court Proceeding

Leave required

New York statewide rules require permission before photographing, filming, videotaping, audiotaping, broadcasting, or telecasting in court facilities, including courtrooms.

Page
Official rule page
Section
Part 29.1(a); party litigation recording requests and appellate/court-specific permissions are separately addressed
Last checked
July 26, 2026
Verification
Automated checks passed
Read supporting source excerpt
Taking photographs, films or videotapes, or audiotaping, broadcasting or telecasting, in a courthouse including any courtroom, office or hallway thereof, at any time or on any occasion, whether or not the court is in session, is forbidden, unless permission of the Chief Administrator of the Courts or a designee of the Chief Administrator is first obtained

The requirement is stated in an official statewide source and is attached as applicable guidance, not as a personal preference.

StatewideExplicit
Hearing Or Trial

Allowed with notice

The official Guide to New York Evidence identifies court control over presentation of evidence as a statewide evidence topic; counsel should expect the assigned judge to control the mode and order of proof.

Page
Official evidence guide page
Section
Article 1, Court's Role table of contents; consult the current rule document and case-specific orders before relying on demonstratives
Last checked
July 26, 2026
Verification
Automated checks passed
Read supporting source excerpt
1.07. COURT CONTROL OVER PRESENTATION OF EVIDENCE

The requirement is stated in an official statewide source and is attached as applicable guidance, not as a personal preference.

05

Courtroom technology

Published equipment guidance

No technology specification indexed

Technology availability is separate from procedural permission and evidentiary admissibility.

06

Published opinion footprint

Decisions and citations

Opinion data is not yet indexed for this profile

This does not mean the judge has no published opinions or no caseload. KYJ will only show opinion counts after transparent, source-linked CourtListener matching is available.

07

Sources

Public documents behind this profile

08

Change history

How this profile entered KYJ

Current profile indexed

Identity imported from New York State Unified Court System. 3 presentation-related claims migrated with source provenance.