E. Danielle Jose Decker at a glance
- Current role
- Supreme Court Justice
- Court
- Sullivan County Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- New York · State
- Judicial service
- January 1, 2021–present
E. Danielle Jose Decker
Supreme Court Justice · Sullivan County Supreme Court
Available research
Loading public docket analytics…
Loading public docket analytics…
Biography
Professional career
- Sullivan County District Attorney's Office, Assistant District Attorney, 2000 to 2002
- SUNY Sullivan, Adjunct Professor, 2011 to 2012
- Town of Lumberland, Attorney for the Town, 2011 to 2020
- NYS Unified Court System, Sullivan County Liaison for the NYS Appellate Division, Third Department Office of Attorneys for Children, 2016 to 2020
- Town of Forestburgh, Attorney for the Town, 2016 to 2020
- Town of Tusten, Attorney for the Town, 2020 to 2020
- Ricciani & Jose, LLP, Partner, 2004 to 2020
- Greenwald Law Offices, Senior Associate, 2002 to 2004
- Village of Wurtsboro, Village Attorney, 2019 to 2020
- Town of Fallsburg, Special Counsel, 2019 to 2020
- Village of Monticello, Village Attorney, 2004 to 2008
Judicial service
- Judge, County Court, Sullivan County (Multi-Bench; County, Surrogate's, Family), Elected, 2021 to 2030
- Acting Supreme Court Justice, County Court, Sullivan County (Multi-Bench; County, Surrogate's, Family), Designated by Acting Chief Administrative Judge Tamiko Amaker, 2023 to Present
- Supervising Judge, Town and Village Courts for the Third Judicial District, 2024-present
Education
- Albany Law School of Union University · J.D., 2000
Courtroom rules and guidance
Recording And Photography
New York statewide rules require permission before photographing, filming, videotaping, audiotaping, broadcasting, or telecasting in court facilities, including courtrooms.
Taking photographs, films or videotapes, or audiotaping, broadcasting or telecasting, in a courthouse including any courtroom, office or hallway thereof, at any time or on any occasion, whether or not the court is in session, is forbidden, unless permission of the Chief Administrator of the Courts or a designee of the Chief Administrator is first obtainedPart 29: Electronic Recording and Audio-Visual Coverage in Court Facilities and of Court Proceedings ↗
Evidence Presentation Control
The official Guide to New York Evidence identifies court control over presentation of evidence as a statewide evidence topic; counsel should expect the assigned judge to control the mode and order of proof.
1.07. COURT CONTROL OVER PRESENTATION OF EVIDENCEGuide to New York Evidence: Article 1, General Provisions and Court's Role ↗
Trial Exhibit Books
In New York Supreme Court and County Court civil cases, the court may require indexed trial exhibit binders, notebooks, or electronic equivalents for the court, counsel, and witnesses.
The court may direct that on the first day of trial or at such other time as the court may set, counsel shall submit an indexed binder or notebook, or the electronic equivalent, of trial exhibits for the court's use.Part 202: Uniform Civil Rules for the Supreme Court and the County Court ↗
Exhibit Marking
Civil trial counsel in New York Supreme Court and County Court must confer before trial and attempt to agree on exhibits to be offered without objection, unless the court directs otherwise.
Counsel for the parties shall consult prior to trial and shall in good faith attempt to agree upon the exhibits that will be offered into evidence without objection.Part 202: Uniform Civil Rules for the Supreme Court and the County Court ↗
Virtual Evidence Courtroom
For Commercial Division matters, New York rules encourage Virtual Evidence Courtrooms for managing and presenting trial evidence after authorization by request or court direction.
Virtual Evidence Courtrooms (VECs) may be used to facilitate real-time access to trial exhibits and other relevant documents.Part 202.70 Commercial Division Rules: Virtual Evidence Courtrooms and Trial Exhibits ↗
Electronic Appearances
For New York criminal proceedings, virtual and hybrid appearances are governed by Part 200 consent, objection, public-access, and calendar-update requirements.
For all hybrid proceedings, all electronic appearances shall be projected in the physical courtroom in which the in-person portion of the proceeding is taking place in such a manner as to provide a reasonable opportunity for members of the public to view and hear the participants appearing electronically.Part 200: Uniform Rules for Courts Exercising Criminal Jurisdiction ↗
Sources
New York State Unified Court System Judicial Directory official judicial roster
Identity source · HTML · checked July 26, 2026
https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/judicialdirectory/Bio?judge_id=CN/xd8fs1p/bE25369VOSg%3D%3DPart 29: Electronic Recording and Audio-Visual Coverage in Court Facilities and of Court Proceedings
Judge research source · HTML · checked July 26, 2026
https://www.nycourts.gov/rules/part-29-electronic-recording-and-audio-visual-coverage-court-facilities-and-court-proceedings?from_node=15921&topic=386&wrapped=trueGuide to New York Evidence: Article 1, General Provisions and Court's Role
Judge research source · HTML · checked July 26, 2026
https://www.nycourts.gov/judges/evidence/1-GENERAL/1-generalprovisions.shtmlPart 202: Uniform Civil Rules for the Supreme Court and the County Court
Judge research source · HTML · checked July 26, 2026
https://www.nycourts.gov/rules/part-202-uniform-civil-rules-supreme-court-and-county-courtPart 202.70 Commercial Division Rules: Virtual Evidence Courtrooms and Trial Exhibits
Judge research source · HTML · checked July 26, 2026
https://www.nycourts.gov/rules/part-202-uniform-civil-rules-supreme-court-and-county-courtPart 200: Uniform Rules for Courts Exercising Criminal Jurisdiction
Judge research source · HTML · checked July 26, 2026
https://www.nycourts.gov/rules/part-200-uniform-rules-courts-exercising-criminal-jurisdiction