Deborah K. Chasanow at a glance
- Current role
- Judge
- Court
- U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland
- Jurisdiction
- Maryland · Federal
- Judicial service
- October 20, 1993–present
Deborah K. Chasanow
Judge · U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland
Available research
Case AnalyticsPrecomputed 1Y, 2Y, 5Y, and 10Y public federal docket metricsAI abuse cases2 directly linked casesBiography and careerSource-attributed professional, judicial, and education recordCourtroom rules2 sourced items, labeled by scopeSourcesOfficial and public records supporting this profile
Loading public docket analytics…
Loading public docket analytics…
AI abuse cases
2 casesAI-related ruling · January 23, 2026
Future Field Solutions v. Nordstrand
- Court response
- No Sanctions at this time
AI-related ruling · January 23, 2026
Future Field Solutions, LLC v. Van Norstrand
Biography
Professional career
- U.S. Magistrate, U.S. District Court, District of Maryland, 1987-1993
- chief, Criminal Appeals Division, 1979-1987
- Assistant attorney general, State of Maryland, 1975-1987
- Private practice, Washington, D.C., 1975-present
- Law clerk, Hon. David L. Cahoon, Maryland Circuit Court, Montgomery County, 1974-1975
Judicial service
- Judge, District Court, D. Maryland, 1993-2014
Education
- Rutgers University-New Brunswick · B.A., 1970
- Stanford University · J.D., 1974
- Rutgers University
Personal record
Born 1948 · Washington, DC
Courtroom rules and guidance
Civil Remote Testimony
In federal district-court civil proceedings, testimony is ordinarily taken in open court; remote contemporaneous testimony requires good cause in compelling circumstances and appropriate safeguards.
For good cause in compelling circumstances and with appropriate safeguards, the court may permit testimony in open court by contemporaneous transmission from a different location.Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 43(a), Testimony in Open Court ↗
Criminal Recording And Broadcasting
Federal district courts may not permit courtroom photography or broadcasting during criminal judicial proceedings unless a statute or another federal rule provides an exception.
Except as otherwise provided by a statute or these rules, the court must not permit the taking of photographs in the courtroom during judicial proceedings or the broadcasting of judicial proceedings from the courtroom.Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 53, Courtroom Photographing and Broadcasting Prohibited ↗
Sources
Federal Judicial Center biography
Identity source · HTML · checked July 25, 2026
https://www.fjc.gov/node/1379016CourtListener judicial biographical directory
Identity source · HTML · checked August 2, 2026
https://www.courtlistener.com/person/590/deborah-k-chasanow/Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 43(a), Testimony in Open Court
Judge research source · HTML · checked July 26, 2026
https://www.uscourts.gov/forms-rules/current-rules-practice-procedure/federal-rules-civil-procedureFederal Rule of Criminal Procedure 53, Courtroom Photographing and Broadcasting Prohibited
Judge research source · HTML · checked July 26, 2026
https://www.uscourts.gov/court-records/access-court-proceedings/remote-public-access-proceedings/history-cameras-broadcasting-and-remote-public-access-courts