Anna Marie Manasco at a glance
- Current role
- Judge
- Court
- U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
- Jurisdiction
- Alabama · Federal
- Judicial service
- May 27, 2020–present
Anna Marie Manasco
Judge · U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama
Available research
Case AnalyticsPrecomputed 1Y, 2Y, 5Y, and 10Y public federal docket metricsAI abuse cases3 directly linked casesBiography and careerSource-attributed professional, judicial, and education recordCourtroom rules2 sourced items, labeled by scopeSourcesOfficial and public records supporting this profile
Loading public docket analytics…
Loading public docket analytics…
AI abuse cases
3 casesAI-related ruling · August 3, 2026
Perry v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
- Court response
- Warning
AI-related ruling · March 31, 2026
Joel A. Rivera v. Triad Properties Corporation, et al.
- Court response
- Public Reprimand; Disqualification; Bar Referral; Publication and Notice of Order; Adverse Costs Order
AI-related ruling · July 23, 2025
Johnson v. Dunn
- Court response
- Public reprimand, disqualification from the case, and referral to the Bar
Biography
Professional career
- Partner, Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP, Birmingham, AL, 2019-2020
- Practitioner, Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP, Birgmingham, AL, 2009-2018
Judicial service
- Law Clerk, Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, Birmingham, AL, 2008-2009
- Judge, District Court, N.D. Alabama, AL, 2020-present
Education
- Emory University · summa cum laude
- University of Oxford · PHD
- Yale University · JD
Personal record
Born 1980 · Montgomery, AL
Courtroom rules and guidance
Civil Remote Testimony
In federal district-court civil proceedings, testimony is ordinarily taken in open court; remote contemporaneous testimony requires good cause in compelling circumstances and appropriate safeguards.
For good cause in compelling circumstances and with appropriate safeguards, the court may permit testimony in open court by contemporaneous transmission from a different location.Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 43(a), Testimony in Open Court ↗
Criminal Recording And Broadcasting
Federal district courts may not permit courtroom photography or broadcasting during criminal judicial proceedings unless a statute or another federal rule provides an exception.
Except as otherwise provided by a statute or these rules, the court must not permit the taking of photographs in the courtroom during judicial proceedings or the broadcasting of judicial proceedings from the courtroom.Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 53, Courtroom Photographing and Broadcasting Prohibited ↗
Sources
Federal Judicial Center biography
Identity source · HTML · checked July 25, 2026
https://www.fjc.gov/node/8307866CourtListener judicial biographical directory
Identity source · HTML · checked August 2, 2026
https://www.courtlistener.com/person/15384/anna-marie-manasco/Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 43(a), Testimony in Open Court
Judge research source · HTML · checked July 26, 2026
https://www.uscourts.gov/forms-rules/current-rules-practice-procedure/federal-rules-civil-procedureFederal Rule of Criminal Procedure 53, Courtroom Photographing and Broadcasting Prohibited
Judge research source · HTML · checked July 26, 2026
https://www.uscourts.gov/court-records/access-court-proceedings/remote-public-access-proceedings/history-cameras-broadcasting-and-remote-public-access-courts