Ann Marie McIff Allen at a glance
- Current role
- Judge
- Court
- U.S. District Court for the District of Utah
- Jurisdiction
- Utah · Federal
- Judicial service
- April 12, 2024–present
Ann Marie McIff Allen
Judge · U.S. District Court for the District of Utah
Available research
Case AnalyticsPrecomputed 1Y, 2Y, 5Y, and 10Y public federal docket metricsAI abuse cases4 directly linked casesBiography and careerSource-attributed professional, judicial, and education recordCourtroom rules2 sourced items, labeled by scopeSourcesOfficial and public records supporting this profile
Loading public docket analytics…
Loading public docket analytics…
AI abuse cases
4 casesAI-related ruling · July 30, 2026
Carey v. Breakell et al.
AI-related ruling · July 23, 2026
Hagan v. Black Diamond Experts, LLC
- Court response
- Admonishment & Warning
AI-related ruling · April 22, 2026
Primerica Life Insurance Company v. Daniel Vett Finlayson; Michelle Johnson
- Court response
- Warning
AI-related ruling · November 5, 2025
Ross Logan v. LVNV Funding et al.
- Court response
- Warning
Biography
Professional career
- Professional Career: Adjunct instructor, Southern Utah University, 2014-ca.
- Professional Career: Adjunct instructor, Utah Valley State College (now Utah Valley University), 1999-2001
- Professional Career: Deputy county attorney, Iron County, Utah, 2007-2013
- Professional Career: Adjunct instructor, Brigham Young University J. Reuben Clark Law School, 1997-1998
- Professional Career: Deputy county attorney, Garfield County, Utah, 2014-2020
- Professional Career: Private practice, Cedar City, Utah, 2001-2007, 2013-2016
- Professional Career: Southern Utah University, 2016-2020; special counsel and director of ethics and compliance, 2016-2017; general counsel, 2018-2020
Judicial service
- Professional Career: Judge, Utah District Court, Fifth District, 2020-2024
Education
- J. Reuben Clark Law School · J.D., 1997
- Brigham Young University · J.D., 1997
Personal record
Born 1972 · Richfield
Courtroom rules and guidance
Civil Remote Testimony
In federal district-court civil proceedings, testimony is ordinarily taken in open court; remote contemporaneous testimony requires good cause in compelling circumstances and appropriate safeguards.
For good cause in compelling circumstances and with appropriate safeguards, the court may permit testimony in open court by contemporaneous transmission from a different location.Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 43(a), Testimony in Open Court ↗
Criminal Recording And Broadcasting
Federal district courts may not permit courtroom photography or broadcasting during criminal judicial proceedings unless a statute or another federal rule provides an exception.
Except as otherwise provided by a statute or these rules, the court must not permit the taking of photographs in the courtroom during judicial proceedings or the broadcasting of judicial proceedings from the courtroom.Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 53, Courtroom Photographing and Broadcasting Prohibited ↗
Sources
Federal Judicial Center biography
Identity source · HTML · checked July 25, 2026
https://www.fjc.gov/node/13761626Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 43(a), Testimony in Open Court
Judge research source · HTML · checked July 26, 2026
https://www.uscourts.gov/forms-rules/current-rules-practice-procedure/federal-rules-civil-procedureFederal Rule of Criminal Procedure 53, Courtroom Photographing and Broadcasting Prohibited
Judge research source · HTML · checked July 26, 2026
https://www.uscourts.gov/court-records/access-court-proceedings/remote-public-access-proceedings/history-cameras-broadcasting-and-remote-public-access-courts