Ann Marie Donnelly at a glance
- Current role
- Judge
- Court
- U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York
- Jurisdiction
- New York · Federal
- Judicial service
- October 21, 2015–present
Ann Marie Donnelly
Judge · U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Available research
Case AnalyticsPrecomputed 1Y, 2Y, 5Y, and 10Y public federal docket metricsAI abuse cases2 directly linked casesBiography and careerSource-attributed professional, judicial, and education recordCourtroom rules2 sourced items, labeled by scopeSourcesOfficial and public records supporting this profile
Loading public docket analytics…
Loading public docket analytics…
AI abuse cases
2 casesAI-related ruling · June 4, 2026
Owens v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
- Court response
- Warning
AI-related ruling · December 3, 2025
Farrow v. John Does
Biography
Professional career
- Supreme Court of New York County [New York], criminal term, 2014-2015
- Supreme Court of Kings County [New York], criminal term, 2013-2014
- Special Term for Election Matters, 2013-present
- Supreme Court of Bronx County [New York], criminal term, 2009-2013
- Judge, New York State Court of Claims, 2009-2015
- bureau chief, Family Violence Child Abuse Bureau, 2005-2009
- senior trial counsel, 1997-2005
- assistant district attorney, 1984-1997
- New York County [New York] District Attorney's Office, 1984-2009
Judicial service
- Judge, District Court, E.D. New York, 2015-present
- United States federal judge
Education
- University of Michigan-Ann Arbor · B.A., 1981
- Ohio State University-Main Campus · J.D., 1984
- University of Michigan
- Moritz College of Law
Personal record
Born 1959 · Royal Oak, MI
Courtroom rules and guidance
Civil Remote Testimony
In federal district-court civil proceedings, testimony is ordinarily taken in open court; remote contemporaneous testimony requires good cause in compelling circumstances and appropriate safeguards.
For good cause in compelling circumstances and with appropriate safeguards, the court may permit testimony in open court by contemporaneous transmission from a different location.Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 43(a), Testimony in Open Court ↗
Criminal Recording And Broadcasting
Federal district courts may not permit courtroom photography or broadcasting during criminal judicial proceedings unless a statute or another federal rule provides an exception.
Except as otherwise provided by a statute or these rules, the court must not permit the taking of photographs in the courtroom during judicial proceedings or the broadcasting of judicial proceedings from the courtroom.Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 53, Courtroom Photographing and Broadcasting Prohibited ↗
Sources
Federal Judicial Center biography
Identity source · HTML · checked July 25, 2026
https://www.fjc.gov/node/1394806CourtListener judicial biographical directory
Identity source · HTML · checked August 2, 2026
https://www.courtlistener.com/person/8569/ann-marie-donnelly/Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 43(a), Testimony in Open Court
Judge research source · HTML · checked July 26, 2026
https://www.uscourts.gov/forms-rules/current-rules-practice-procedure/federal-rules-civil-procedureFederal Rule of Criminal Procedure 53, Courtroom Photographing and Broadcasting Prohibited
Judge research source · HTML · checked July 26, 2026
https://www.uscourts.gov/court-records/access-court-proceedings/remote-public-access-proceedings/history-cameras-broadcasting-and-remote-public-access-courts