Analisa Nadine Torres at a glance
- Current role
- Judge
- Court
- U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
- Jurisdiction
- New York · Federal
- Judicial service
- April 23, 2013–present
Analisa Nadine Torres
Judge · U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
Available research
Case AnalyticsPrecomputed 1Y, 2Y, 5Y, and 10Y public federal docket metricsAI abuse cases2 directly linked casesBiography and careerSource-attributed professional, judicial, and education recordCourtroom rules2 sourced items, labeled by scopeSourcesOfficial and public records supporting this profile
Loading public docket analytics…
Loading public docket analytics…
AI abuse cases
2 casesAI-related ruling · July 30, 2026
Nirav Modi v. Richard Levin, Trustee for the Liquidating Trust of Firestar Diamond, Inc.
AI-related ruling · October 28, 2025
Sehra Waheed v. SM 1 MMS, LLC, et al.
Biography
Professional career
- acting justice, 2004-2011
- Justice, Supreme Court of the State of New York, Criminal Term, 2004-2013
- Judge, Civil Court of the City of New York, 2003-2004
- Judge, Criminal Court of the City of New York, 2000-2002
- Commissioner, New York City Planning Commission, 1993-1995
- Law clerk, Hon. Elliott Wilk, Supreme Court of the State of New York, Civil Term, 1992-1999
- General counsel, South Bronx New York Overall Economic Development Corp., 1992-present
- Private practice, New York City, 1984-1992
Judicial service
- Judge, District Court, S.D. New York, 2013-present
Education
- Harvard University · A.B., 1981
- Columbia Law School
Personal record
Born 1959 · New York, NY
Courtroom rules and guidance
Civil Remote Testimony
In federal district-court civil proceedings, testimony is ordinarily taken in open court; remote contemporaneous testimony requires good cause in compelling circumstances and appropriate safeguards.
For good cause in compelling circumstances and with appropriate safeguards, the court may permit testimony in open court by contemporaneous transmission from a different location.Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 43(a), Testimony in Open Court ↗
Criminal Recording And Broadcasting
Federal district courts may not permit courtroom photography or broadcasting during criminal judicial proceedings unless a statute or another federal rule provides an exception.
Except as otherwise provided by a statute or these rules, the court must not permit the taking of photographs in the courtroom during judicial proceedings or the broadcasting of judicial proceedings from the courtroom.Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 53, Courtroom Photographing and Broadcasting Prohibited ↗
Sources
Federal Judicial Center biography
Identity source · HTML · checked July 25, 2026
https://www.fjc.gov/node/1394176CourtListener judicial biographical directory
Identity source · HTML · checked August 2, 2026
https://www.courtlistener.com/person/3243/analisa-nadine-torres/Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 43(a), Testimony in Open Court
Judge research source · HTML · checked July 26, 2026
https://www.uscourts.gov/forms-rules/current-rules-practice-procedure/federal-rules-civil-procedureFederal Rule of Criminal Procedure 53, Courtroom Photographing and Broadcasting Prohibited
Judge research source · HTML · checked July 26, 2026
https://www.uscourts.gov/court-records/access-court-proceedings/remote-public-access-proceedings/history-cameras-broadcasting-and-remote-public-access-courts