Amy Margaret Baggio at a glance
- Current role
- Judge
- Court
- U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon
- Jurisdiction
- Oregon · Federal
- Judicial service
- August 22, 2024–present
Amy Margaret Baggio
Judge · U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon
Available research
Loading public docket analytics…
Loading public docket analytics…
AI abuse cases
1 caseAI-related ruling · February 18, 2026
David Martin v. ODS Community Dental Insurance et al.
Biography
Professional career
- Professional Career: Office of the Federal Public Defender, District of Oregon, 2002-2012; research and writing attorney, 2002-2005; assistant federal public defender, 2005-2012
- Professional Career: Trial attorney, Metropolitan Public Defender, Portland, Oregon, 2001-2002
- Professional Career: Private practice, Portland, Oregon, 2013-2019
Judicial service
- Professional Career: Judge, Oregon Circuit Court, Multnomah County, 2019-2024
Education
- Wake Forest University · B.A., 1995
- Northwestern School of Law of Lewis and Clark College · J.D., 2001
Courtroom rules and guidance
Courtroom Technology
Judge-specific source
(2) At least TWENTY-ONE (21) days prior to the scheduled pretrial conference any responses to motions in limine and objections to exhibits and witness, if any, shall be filed. The courtroom is equipped with digital evidence presentation. Counsel are encouraged to use this equipment at trial.files ↗
Presentation Procedure
Judge-specific source
Courtroom Rules . For persons other than counsel appearing in a given case, electronic devices must be turned off before entering the courtroom. .United States District Judge Amy Baggio ↗
Civil Remote Testimony
In federal district-court civil proceedings, testimony is ordinarily taken in open court; remote contemporaneous testimony requires good cause in compelling circumstances and appropriate safeguards.
For good cause in compelling circumstances and with appropriate safeguards, the court may permit testimony in open court by contemporaneous transmission from a different location.Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 43(a), Testimony in Open Court ↗
Criminal Recording And Broadcasting
Federal district courts may not permit courtroom photography or broadcasting during criminal judicial proceedings unless a statute or another federal rule provides an exception.
Except as otherwise provided by a statute or these rules, the court must not permit the taking of photographs in the courtroom during judicial proceedings or the broadcasting of judicial proceedings from the courtroom.Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 53, Courtroom Photographing and Broadcasting Prohibited ↗
Sources
Federal Judicial Center biography
Identity source · HTML · checked July 25, 2026
https://www.fjc.gov/node/13761496files
Judge research source · HTML · checked July 24, 2026
https://www.ord.uscourts.gov/index.php/component/rsfiles/download-file/files?path=judges%2FAB%2FTMO%2FCriminal%2BJury%2BTrial%2BManagement%2BOrder.pdf&Itemid=1581United States District Judge Amy Baggio
Judge research source · HTML · checked July 24, 2026
https://www.ord.uscourts.gov/index.php/court-info/our-judges/judge-baggioFederal Rule of Civil Procedure 43(a), Testimony in Open Court
Judge research source · HTML · checked July 26, 2026
https://www.uscourts.gov/forms-rules/current-rules-practice-procedure/federal-rules-civil-procedureFederal Rule of Criminal Procedure 53, Courtroom Photographing and Broadcasting Prohibited
Judge research source · HTML · checked July 26, 2026
https://www.uscourts.gov/court-records/access-court-proceedings/remote-public-access-proceedings/history-cameras-broadcasting-and-remote-public-access-courts